Pages

Elongation factors bind alternately to the ribosome


KEY CONCEPTS:
  • Translocation requires EF-G, whose structure resembles the aminoacyl-tRNA·EF-Tu·GTP complex.
  • Binding of EF-Tu and EF-G to the ribosome is mutually exclusive.
  • Translocation requires GTP hydrolysis, which triggers a change in EF-G, which in turn triggers a change in ribosome structure.

Translocation requires GTP and another elongation factor, EF-G. This factor is a major constituent of the cell; it is present at a level of ~1 copy per ribosome (20,000 molecules per cell).
Ribosomes cannot bind EF-Tu and EF-G simultaneously, so protein synthesis follows the cycle illustrated in Figure 151 in which the factors are alternately bound to, and released from, the ribosome. So EF-Tu·GDP must be released before EF-G can bind; and then EF-G must be released before aminoacyl-tRNA·EF-Tu·GTP can bind.

Does the ability of each elongation factor to exclude the other rely on an allosteric effect on the overall conformation of the ribosome or on direct competition for overlapping binding sites? Figure 6.30 shows an extraordinary similarity between the structures of the ternary complex of aminoacyl-tRNA·EF-Tu·GDP and EF-G (Nissen et al., 1995). The structure of EF-G mimics the overall structure of EF-Tu bound to the amino acceptor stem of aminoacyl-tRNA. This creates the immediate assumption that they compete for the same binding site (presumably in the vicinity of the A site). The need for each factor to be released before the other can bind ensures that the events of protein synthesis proceed in an orderly manner (Nissen et al., 1995).
Both elongation factors are monomeric GTP-binding proteins that are active when bound to GTP but inactive when bound to GDP. The triphosphate form is required for binding to the ribosome, which ensures that each factor obtains access to the ribosome only in the company of the GTP that it needs to fulfill its function.
EF-G binds to the ribosome to sponsor translocation; and then is released following ribosome movement. EF-G can still bind to the ribosome when GMP-PCP is substituted for GTP; thus the presence of a guanine nucleotide is needed for binding, but its hydrolysis is not absolutely essential for translocation (although translocation is much slower in the absence of GTP hydrolysis). The hydrolysis of GTP is needed to release EF-G.

The need for EF-G release was discovered by the effects of the steroid antibiotic fusidic acid, which "jams" the ribosome in its post-translocation state (see Figure 6.31). In the presence of fusidic acid, one round of translocation occurs: EF-G binds to the ribosome, GTP is hydrolyzed, and the ribosome moves three nucleotides. But fusidic acid stabilizes the ribosome·EF-G·GDP complex, so that EF-G and GDP remain on the ribosome instead of being released. Because the ribosome then cannot bind aminoacyl-tRNA, no further amino acids can be added to the chain.
Translocation is an intrinsic property of the ribosome that requires a major change in structure (see 6.17 Ribosomes have several active centers). However, its activated by EF-G in conjunction with GTP hydrolysis, which occurs before translocation and accelerates the ribosome movement. The most likely mechanism is that GTP hydrolysis causes a change in the structure of EF-G, which in turn forces a change in the ribosome structure. An extensive reorientation of EF-G occurs at translocation (Stark et al., 2000). Before translocation, it is bound across the two ribosomal subunits. Most of its contacts with the 30S subunit are made by a region called domain 4, which is inserted into the A site. This domain could be responsible for displacing the tRNA. After translocation, domain 4 is instead oriented toward the 50S subunit.
The eukaryotic counterpart to EF-G is the protein eEF2, which functions in a similar manner, as a translocase dependent on GTP hydrolysis. Its action also is inhibited by fusidic acid. A stable complex of eEF2 with GTP can be isolated; and the complex can bind to ribosomes with consequent hydrolysis of its GTP.
A unique reaction of eEF2 is its susceptibility to diphtheria toxin. The toxin uses NAD (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) as a cofactor to transfer an ADPR moiety (adenosine diphosphate ribosyl) on to the eEF2. The ADPR-eEF2 conjugate is inactive in protein synthesis. The substrate for the attachment is an unusual amino acid, produced by modifying a histidine; it is common to the eEF2 of many species.
The ADP-ribosylation is responsible for the lethal effects of diphtheria toxin. The reaction is extremely effective: a single molecule of toxin can modify sufficient eEF2 molecules to kill a cell.